Typo3 Reviews & Ratings

3.8/5

“TYPO3: A Reliable CMS with Strong Community Support”

TYPO3’s long-standing presence and strong community support make it a reliable CMS. Its open-source nature and dedicated ecosystem contribute to its ongoing relevance.

Pros : TYPO3 is a mature CMS with a dedicated community that has maintained its relevance and vitality over the years. Its open-source nature ensures that it remains a strong choice for web development.

Cons : The focus of TYPO3 activity is often centered in Germany, which can make it harder for non-Germans to find local resources and support.

Switched from : Contentdada

Reason to switch : I chose TYPO3 for its established reputation and active community. Although finding local resources can be challenging, its long-term support and open-source benefits made it the right choice for my needs.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: A Comprehensive Solution for Managing Web Portals”

TYPO3 is a solid choice for managing and tracking your company's web portals. It provides extensive features for scheduling posts and managing marketing channels, along with integrations with various third-party tools. The AI-driven features enhance your marketing efforts by helping you create graphics and templates effortlessly. However, its performance can suffer on mobile devices, and it might not always be the quickest in terms of response.

Pros : TYPO3 offers a wide range of features that make managing web portals straightforward. It allows you to schedule posts, handle multiple marketing channels, and integrates smoothly with third-party tools. Plus, its AI features help in creating marketing graphics and templates with ease.

Cons : One downside is that TYPO3's performance can lag on mobile devices. The tools can also be slow and less responsive at times, which might be frustrating.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I switched to TYPO3 for its advanced features and the ability to integrate with various third-party applications. Despite some performance issues on mobile, its comprehensive feature set and AI capabilities make it a valuable tool for managing complex web portals.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: A Comprehensive Solution for Managing Web Portals”

TYPO3 is a solid choice for managing and tracking your company's web portals. It provides extensive features for scheduling posts and managing marketing channels, along with integrations with various third-party tools. The AI-driven features enhance your marketing efforts by helping you create graphics and templates effortlessly. However, its performance can suffer on mobile devices, and it might not always be the quickest in terms of response.

Pros : TYPO3 offers a wide range of features that make managing web portals straightforward. It allows you to schedule posts, handle multiple marketing channels, and integrates smoothly with third-party tools. Plus, its AI features help in creating marketing graphics and templates with ease.

Cons : One downside is that TYPO3's performance can lag on mobile devices. The tools can also be slow and less responsive at times, which might be frustrating.

Switched from : Wordpress

Reason to switch : I switched to TYPO3 for its advanced features and the ability to integrate with various third-party applications. Despite some performance issues on mobile, its comprehensive feature set and AI capabilities make it a valuable tool for managing complex web portals.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: Versatile CMS for Various Needs”

TYPO3’s versatility is its standout feature, accommodating a wide range of uses from small non-profits to large enterprises. However, its configurability can make it complicated for editors, and having a predefined simplified setting would make initial setups easier.

Pros : TYPO3 is incredibly versatile, suitable for everything from small non-profits to large multinational sites. Its ability to adapt to different needs makes it a valuable tool.

Cons : Configuring TYPO3 to be simpler for editors can be a challenge due to its high level of configurability. It would be helpful to have a built-in simplified setting.

Reason to switch : TYPO3’s adaptability for various types of organizations and its extensive feature set were key reasons for choosing it. Although configuration can be complex, its versatility made it the best fit for diverse needs.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: A Powerful CMS for Any Scale”

TYPO3 stands out for its scalability and ability to handle various types of websites. It utilizes modern technical elements, making it a versatile choice. However, it lacks a well-supported online shop solution, which can be a limitation for e-commerce needs.

Pros : TYPO3 is a powerful CMS capable of handling a wide range of site types, from simple to complex. It’s scalable and incorporates the latest technical elements.

Cons : A major drawback is the lack of a solid online shop solution supported by TYPO3, which would be beneficial for users needing e-commerce capabilities.

Reason to switch : I opted for TYPO3 because of its scalability and modern features. Despite the lack of a built-in online shop solution, its overall capabilities made it a preferable choice for managing diverse website needs.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: Ideal for Enterprise Websites”

TYPO3 is well-suited for creating both enterprise and smaller websites. It offers stability and robust performance, supported by a helpful community. However, its lower adoption rate compared to other CMS platforms means fewer specialized agencies are available.

Pros : TYPO3 is excellent for building enterprise-level websites as well as smaller sites. Its stability, performance, and security are well-supported by both the core system and the community.

Cons : TYPO3's adoption is lower compared to other CMS like WordPress, which can result in fewer agencies specializing in it.

Reason to switch : I chose TYPO3 for its reliability and support for large-scale websites. Despite the lower adoption rate, its comprehensive features and community support made it a strong choice for enterprise applications.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: A Great CMS for Multi-Domain Functionality”

TYPO3 is highly effective for managing multiple domains, providing a versatile solution for various website needs. While I haven't encountered major issues, the initial setup might be a bit challenging for some users.

Pros : TYPO3 excels in multi-domain functionality, allowing you to manage various domains efficiently. Its capabilities make it a great choice for diverse website needs.

Cons : One downside is that there are no significant issues I’ve encountered with TYPO3, but some users may find the initial setup challenging.

Switched from : Contentdada

Reason to switch : I chose TYPO3 for its impressive multi-domain functionality. Despite the potential challenges during setup, its ability to handle multiple domains made it an ideal choice.

3.7/5

“TYPO3: Great for Modular and Multi-Language Sites”

TYPO3 is praised for its modular design and the concept of page trees, which simplifies managing complex sites. The active community is a valuable resource for users. However, the lack of contributions from some users can mean fewer resources and support.

Pros : TYPO3’s modular structure and page tree concept make it great for managing complex sites. Its active community is also a plus, offering support and resources.

Cons : One issue is that not all users contribute to the community, which can limit the amount of available help and resources.

Reason to switch : I switched to TYPO3 for its modular structure and community support. While the community isn’t perfect, the benefits of the page tree concept and the modular setup made it the right choice for managing complex sites.

3.6/5

“TYPO3: An Excellent CMS for Large-Scale Applications”

TYPO3 is a great CMS for handling large-scale applications, providing extensive customization and extension options. While it requires regular maintenance to manage security updates, its capabilities make it a top choice for large projects.

Pros : TYPO3 is ideal for large-scale enterprise applications, offering limitless extension possibilities and a high level of customization.

Cons : The main drawback is the ongoing need for maintenance to address security issues, which can be time-consuming.

Reason to switch : I selected TYPO3 for its extensive customization and scalability for large applications. Despite the maintenance requirements, its ability to handle complex projects made it the best choice.

3.6/5

“TYPO3: A CMS with Great Potential for Those Ready to Learn”

TYPO3’s open-source nature and expandability provide significant potential for those willing to invest time in learning it. Its security and customization options are strong points, but the learning curve and lack of official templates can be challenging.

Pros : TYPO3 offers great possibilities due to its open-source nature and extensive expandability. It's a secure choice with many customization options.

Cons : Difficult to understand

Reason to switch : I chose TYPO3 for its extensive customization and security features. Despite the steep learning curve, its open-source nature and expandability made it a worthwhile investment for those ready to tackle its complexities.