KeystoneJS Reviews & Ratings

4.2/5

“Great for website development with helpful prebuilt codes”

Pros : KeystoneJS comes with prebuilt codes that have made my work much faster. I appreciate how it takes care of a lot of the groundwork, allowing me to focus on more important aspects of the project. Whether it’s managing content or developing APIs, it’s been an invaluable tool in my daily work.

Cons : I haven’t encountered any significant drawbacks, though some more pre-integrated components would be a nice addition.

Switched from : Strapi

Reason to switch : I switched to KeystoneJS because it helped me get through development projects faster while still offering enough flexibility.

4/5

“A fast and flexible platform for website development”

Pros : KeystoneJS, built on Node.js, has been great for developing websites that don’t look like typical CMS-driven products. Its API-first approach lets me design apps that are unique and more in line with what I want to achieve. It also feels faster and more modern compared to other systems I’ve used.

Cons : Since it’s relatively new, there are still some features that could be improved or added, but it’s been steadily growing in functionality.

Reason to switch : I chose KeystoneJS for its modern structure and the flexibility it offers in design and content management.

4/5

“Simplifies website development with less repetitive code”

Pros : KeystoneJS makes my work easier by reducing the amount of repetitive coding required to build websites. Its integration with NodeJS has made development quicker, and the fact that it supports TypeScript is a big plus. I’ve found it to be a great option for both content management and API development.

Cons : While I have no major complaints, there’s always potential for improvement in terms of adding more out-of-the-box features.

Reason to switch : KeystoneJS gave me the tools I needed to manage both APIs and content better.

4/5

“Offers Perfect framework for website development and content management”

Pros : KeystoneJS offers a framework that’s easy to work with and saves a lot of time in the coding process. Its predefined codes make it quicker to develop websites, and it’s great for managing all kinds of content without getting bogged down in unnecessary steps.

Cons : There are some areas where advanced features could be better developed, but for my needs, it’s been more than sufficient.

Reason to switch : I chose KeystoneJS because it offered a more streamlined approach to both content management and coding integration.

3.8/5

“Helpful tool for managing website content”

Pros : KeystoneJS has made managing content across my website much easier. It works like a central system, allowing me to organize and maintain everything from blog posts to product information. I’ve been using it for various projects, and it’s proven to be a great resource for keeping everything in place.

Cons : One area where it could improve is in its customization options. Sometimes I wish there were more features to handle specific situations, but overall, it still serves its purpose well.

Reason to switch : I chose KeystoneJS because I needed a more focused and flexible content management system.

3.8/5

“A practical tool for managing content and developing websites”

Pros : KeystoneJS has been a solid option for building websites and managing content in an organized manner. Its built-in tools make things easier, and the support from the larger developer community is also a big help when I run into questions. It’s a good alternative to other platforms I’ve used in the past.

Cons : I don’t really have anything to dislike, though more advanced customization would make it an even better tool for more complex projects.

Reason to switch : KeystoneJS gave me more control over content management without the unnecessary extras I didn’t need.

3.8/5

“Easy tool for managing content and keeping everything organized”

Pros : KeystoneJS makes it easy to keep my website’s content organized. I like how it helps me structure everything and makes it simple to update or modify content whenever needed. I’ve been able to manage multiple sites without running into too many issues.

Cons : The customization options are good but could be expanded for even more control. Overall, it’s a useful tool that gets the job done.

Reason to switch : KeystoneJS offered more control over how I manage and update content, which was crucial for the types of projects I work on.

3.7/5

“Great for integrating website features and managing content”

Pros : I’ve used KeystoneJS on various projects, including both personal and client websites. It’s been a great resource for integrating web elements and managing all kinds of content. The tool helps me set up everything I need without much hassle, making it a convenient choice for website development.

Cons : While it generally performs well, there are occasional slowdowns when working with larger projects. Fortunately, most of these issues get addressed in updates.

Reason to switch : I moved to KeystoneJS because I needed more freedom in terms of customizing and managing content for my websites.

3.6/5

“Speeds up coding and simplifies content handling”

Perfect Software for managing your website content.

Pros : KeystoneJS has really made my development process quicker. Its framework is easy to work with, and I haven’t encountered any major issues yet. The regular updates and detailed documentation make it a great tool for managing website content. It’s become an integral part of my development projects.

Cons : There are still areas that could be improved, when it comes to making things more accessible for beginners. It’s great overall but not perfect for everyone.

Switched from : Drupal

Reason to switch : I switched to KeystoneJS because I needed a solution that would save me time during development and allow better control over the content.

3.6/5

“An excellent tool for handling content across systems”

Pros : KeystoneJS has made managing content much more straightforward for me. I like how it reduces the amount of repetitive code and allows me to focus more on building the actual structure of the site. Whether I’m working with text, images, or videos, it handles everything well.

Cons : I haven’t run into any significant issues, but there’s always room to add more features for various project needs.

Reason to switch : I needed something that would help me handle APIs better while still making content management easier, and KeystoneJS fit the bill.