linkedin
  • Become a Seller

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage VS NetApp E2800 Series

Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series to find out which one is better. This software comparison between HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and NetApp E2800 Series is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series fits your business.

Quick View

  • Rating & Review
  • Platforms
  • Recommended
  • img 2 Ratings & 2 Reviews
  • Not Available

  • img 3 Ratings & 0 Reviews
  • Not Available

Pricing

img

Price Plans

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

  • Techjockey Verified
  • Free Trial
  • Lifetime Plan
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img

Offers

img

Available offers & discounts

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img

Get Exclusive Offer

Best deals by our expert on your business requirements

Ratings

img

Overall ratings

4.5

2 Ratings & 2 Reviews

85% Likelihood to Recommend

4.4

3 Ratings & 0 Reviews

86% Likelihood to Recommend

Pros & Cons

img

Pros

img

Simple sending, A lot of capacity highlights, High extension potential, Great de...Read more - Arun Kumar Dec 21, 2018

img

Although I wasn't able to create a collaboration with Techjockey and my current ...Read more - Brijesh Vasoya Aug 25, 2018

Not Available

Currently no pros are available. Please check back later

Cons

img

N/A - Brijesh Vasoya Aug 25, 2018

Not Available

Currently no cons are available. Please check back later

Reviews

img

Verified customer reviews

High efficency

Arun Kumar Dec 21, 2018

Great idea

Brijesh Vasoya Aug 25, 2018

Rating

Preethi sinda Aug 18, 2024

Rating

Milan Adhikari Aug 02, 2024

Best Use for

img

Business Size:

  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees
  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees

Business Type:

  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers
  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers

Industries:

  • imgITES
  • imgAll Industries

We provide the best software solution for your business needs

img
img

Features

img

Product features

  • checked Drive Description
  • checked I/O & Expansion
  • checked Operating System
  • checked Protocols
  • checked File Storage
  • checked Customization
  • checked Security
  • checked Affordable Performance
  • checked Energy Star Certification
  • checked DevOps-Ready System
  • checked Maximum Storage Density
  • checked Secure Data
  • checked Higher Flexibility
  • checked Advanced Data Protection
  • checked Worry-Free Reliability
  • checked Proven Simplicity
  • checked Cloud Connectivity
  • checked Ashrae Compliance

Specifications

img

Deployment

  • img Web based
  • img On Premises
  • img Web based
  • img On Premises

Device Supported

  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet
  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet

Supported Platforms

  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu
  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu

Languages support

  • imgEnglish
  • imgEnglish

Alternatives

img

Top Alternative Products

HPE MSA 2050 SAN Storage

HPE MSA 2050 SAN Storage


HPE MSA 2052 SAN Storage

HPE MSA 2052 SAN Storage


HPE 3PAR StoreServ 9000 Storage

HPE 3PAR StoreServ 9000 Storage


HPE Nimble Storage All Flash Arrays

HPE Nimble Storage All Flash Arrays


See all HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage alternatives img
NetApp AFF C190

NetApp AFF C190


NetApp FAS Storage

NetApp FAS Storage


NetApp AFF A-Series

NetApp AFF A-Series


NetApp AFF A900

NetApp AFF A900


See all NetApp E2800 Series alternatives img

Send this comparison to my inbox

img Get directly in your email inbox on your Whatsapp

  • India (भारत)+91
  • United States+1
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

Similar Comparison

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series Comparison FAQs

Software questions,
answered

While HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage offers customized features, NetApp E2800 Series has diverse modules. Select between HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series as per your business needs.

Both these products offer similar features but with a different approach. While HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage emphasizes on user experiences, NetApp E2800 Series focuses on functionalities.

It all depends on the functionalities that you prefer. While HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage offers add-ons along with essential features, NetApp E2800 Series emphasizes on customization.

No, the difference between HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and NetApp E2800 Series lies in terms of features and functionalities. While HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage can be customized as per the user’s needs, NetApp E2800 Series addresses the diverse audience.

It depends upon your business requirement. Both HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and NetApp E2800 Series provides standard features to cater diverse industry needs.

The difference lies in terms of the user interface and functionalities. While HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage is customizable, HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage offers comprehensive modules.

A Quick Comparison Between HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series

Choosing any software for your organisation is a crucial decision. As a decision maker, you must ensure that the software you choose addresses the pain points of your teams and reaps maximum benefit for you.

  • Comparison of HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series In terms of Features
  • HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry
  • Which Is Better? - HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series

Comparison of HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series In terms of Features

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage includes features like Drive Description, I/O & Expansion, Operating System and Protocols. NetApp E2800 Series is known for functionalities like Affordable Performance, Energy Star Certification, DevOps-Ready System and Maximum Storage Density. When you compare HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage vs NetApp E2800 Series, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. The one which suits your business needs is the best.

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage is ideal for industries like ITES. For All Industries, NetApp E2800 Series is a better choice. If you are confused between HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series, you can also check if the software has customizable modules for your industry. Industry-specific functionalities will ensure higher efficiency and ROI. However, do check for the hidden price, is any.

Which Is Better? - HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage or NetApp E2800 Series

HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and NetApp E2800 Series can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs. If you are looking for a platform that is easy to use, has low barriers to entry, and offers a lot of customization, flexibility, and integration options, then you must compare their specifications in detail at the time of demo. Compare HPE StoreEasy 1000 Storage and NetApp E2800 Series during demo to decide which one is best for your business.

Still got Questions on your mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Add Product to Compare

close

Recommended Products

20,000+ Software Listed 20,000+ Software Listed

Best Price Guaranteed Best Price Guaranteed

Free Expert
                        Consultation Free Expert Consultation

2M+ Happy Customers 2M+ Happy Customers