TAO

Online Exam Software

Get Free Demo

Pricing
Industries
Features
Reviews
Gallery
Platform

Price On Request

Get Best Price

Starting at

€ 5,988 /Year

Get Best Price

Education

Education

Secured Data
Eliminate PAN Errors
Masked Face Detection
Report Generation
Online Exam Test

View all Class In Pocket features

User Management
Pattern Grading
Assessments
Question Bank
Scheduling

View all TAO features

Have you used Class In Pocket before?
Write a Review

Have you used TAO before?
Write a Review

View Images/Videos

Have you used Class In Pocket before?
Write a Review

Have you used TAO before?
Write a Review

Deployment

Web Based
On Premises

Device Supported

Desktop
Mobile
Tablet
iPad

Operating System

Ubuntu
Windows
iOS
Android
Mac OS
Windows(Phone)
Linux

Deployment

Web Based
On Premises

Device Supported

Desktop
Mobile
Tablet
iPad

Operating System

Ubuntu
Windows
iOS
Android
Mac OS
Windows(Phone)
Linux

A Quick Comparison Between Class In Pocket and TAO

Let’s have a detailed comparison of Class In Pocket vs TAO to find out which one is better. Let’s discover some of the essential factors that you must consider and decide whether Class In Pocket or TAO fits your business.

Comparison of Class In Pocket vs TAO In terms of Features

Class In Pocket includes features like Secured Data, Eliminate PAN Errors, Masked Face Detection and Report Generation. TAO is known for functionalities like User Management, Pattern Grading, Assessments and Question Bank. When you compare Class In Pocket vs TAO, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. The one which suits your business needs is the best.

Comparison Between Class In Pocket and TAO In terms of Deployment Type

While Class In Pocket supports Web Based deployment; TAO is suitable for Web Based deployment. While selecting between Class In Pocket and TAO, figure out which one of the two is compatible with your devices. This will help in reducing the hassle after implementation.

Class In Pocket or TAO: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry

Class In Pocket is ideal for industries like Education. For Education, TAO is a better choice. If you are confused between Class In Pocket or TAO, you can also check if the software has customizable modules for your industry. Industry-specific functionalities will ensure higher efficiency and ROI. However, do check for the hidden price, is any.

Which Is Better? - Class In Pocket or TAO

Class In Pocket and TAO can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs. If you are looking for a platform that is easy to use, has low barriers to entry, and offers a lot of customization, flexibility, and integration options, then you must compare their specifications in detail at the time of demo. Compare Class In Pocket and TAO during demo to decide which one is best for your business.

FAQs

Is Class In Pocket better than TAO?

While Class In Pocket offers customized features, TAO has diverse modules. Select between Class In Pocket or TAO as per your business needs.

Are Class In Pocket and TAO same?

Both these products offer similar features but with a different approach. While Class In Pocket emphasizes on user experiences, TAO focuses on functionalities.

Which is better Class In Pocket or TAO?

It all depends on the functionalities that you prefer. While Class In Pocket offers add-ons along with essential features, TAO emphasizes on customization.

Is Class In Pocket the same as TAO?

No, the difference between Class In Pocket and TAO lies in terms of features and functionalities. While Class In Pocket can be customized as per the user’s needs, TAO addresses the diverse audience.

Can Class In Pocket replace TAO?

It depends upon your business requirement. Both Class In Pocket and TAO provides standard features to cater diverse industry needs.

What is the difference between Class In Pocket and TAO?

The difference lies in terms of the user interface and functionalities. While Class In Pocket is customizable, Class In Pocket offers comprehensive modules.