linkedin
  • Become a Seller

Cisco Catalyst 9300 VS Extreme Networks 5720 Series

Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series to find out which one is better. This software comparison between Cisco Catalyst 9300 and Extreme Networks 5720 Series is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series fits your business.

Quick View

  • Rating & Review
  • Platforms
  • Recommended
  • Not Available

  • Not Available

  • Not Available

  • Not Available

Pricing

img

Price Plans

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

  • Techjockey Verified
  • Free Trial
  • Lifetime Plan
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img

Offers

img

Available offers & discounts

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img

Get Exclusive Offer

Best deals by our expert on your business requirements

Best Use for

img

Business Size:

  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees
  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees

Business Type:

  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers
  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers

Industries:

  • imgAll Industries
  • imgAll Industries

We provide the best software solution for your business needs

img
img

Features

img

Product features

  • checked 1TB of stacking bandwidth
  • checked ThousandEyes Enabled
  • checked Enhanced Application Hosting
  • checked Secure Tunnel connectivity
  • checked 100G IPsec in hardware
  • checked Stack Power
  • checked Highest 90W UPOE+ Density
  • checked Highest Multigigabit Ports
  • checked Mixed Stacking
  • checked Cisco ASAc Firewall enabled
  • checked Silent Operation
  • checked Cloud-Based Network Management
  • checked Power over Ethernet (PoE)
  • checked Ethernet Fabric Services
  • checked Audio Video Bridging
  • checked Universal Hardware Platform

Specifications

img

Deployment

  • img Web based
  • img On Premises
  • img Web based
  • img On Premises

Device Supported

  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet
  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet

Supported Platforms

  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu
  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu

Languages support

  • imgEnglish
  • imgEnglish

Alternatives

img

Top Alternative Products

Cisco Nexus 3500

Cisco Nexus 3500


​Cisco Catalyst 9200

​Cisco Catalyst 9200


Cisco Nexus 3200

Cisco Nexus 3200


Cisco Nexus 9200

Cisco Nexus 9200


See all Cisco Catalyst 9300 alternatives img
Extreme Networks 5420 Series

Extreme Networks 5420 Series


Extreme Networks 5520 Series

Extreme Networks 5520 Series


Extreme Networks 5320 Series

Extreme Networks 5320 Series


Extreme Networks X435 Series

Extreme Networks X435 Series


See all Extreme Networks 5720 Series alternatives img

Send this comparison to my inbox

img Get directly in your email inbox on your Whatsapp

  • India (भारत)+91
  • United States+1
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

Similar Comparison

Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series Comparison FAQs

Software questions,
answered

While Cisco Catalyst 9300 offers customized features, Extreme Networks 5720 Series has diverse modules. Select between Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series as per your business needs.

Both these products offer similar features but with a different approach. While Cisco Catalyst 9300 emphasizes on user experiences, Extreme Networks 5720 Series focuses on functionalities.

It all depends on the functionalities that you prefer. While Cisco Catalyst 9300 offers add-ons along with essential features, Extreme Networks 5720 Series emphasizes on customization.

No, the difference between Cisco Catalyst 9300 and Extreme Networks 5720 Series lies in terms of features and functionalities. While Cisco Catalyst 9300 can be customized as per the user’s needs, Extreme Networks 5720 Series addresses the diverse audience.

It depends upon your business requirement. Both Cisco Catalyst 9300 and Extreme Networks 5720 Series provides standard features to cater diverse industry needs.

The difference lies in terms of the user interface and functionalities. While Cisco Catalyst 9300 is customizable, Cisco Catalyst 9300 offers comprehensive modules.

A Quick Comparison Between Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series

Choosing any software for your organisation is a crucial decision. As a decision maker, you must ensure that the software you choose addresses the pain points of your teams and reaps maximum benefit for you.

  • Comparison of Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series In terms of Features
  • Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry
  • Which Is Better? - Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series

Comparison of Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series In terms of Features

Cisco Catalyst 9300 includes features like Unlimited Storage and Bandwidth, Enable with multiple services, Photo Enhancement and Secured server. Extreme Networks 5720 Series is known for functionalities like Silent Mode, Wireless Network Support, Power over Ethernet (PoE) and Services. When you compare Cisco Catalyst 9300 vs Extreme Networks 5720 Series, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. The one which suits your business needs is the best.

Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry

Cisco Catalyst 9300 is ideal for industries like All Industries. For All Industries, Extreme Networks 5720 Series is a better choice. If you are confused between Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series, you can also check if the software has customizable modules for your industry. Industry-specific functionalities will ensure higher efficiency and ROI. However, do check for the hidden price, is any.

Which Is Better? - Cisco Catalyst 9300 or Extreme Networks 5720 Series

Cisco Catalyst 9300 and Extreme Networks 5720 Series can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs. If you are looking for a platform that is easy to use, has low barriers to entry, and offers a lot of customization, flexibility, and integration options, then you must compare their specifications in detail at the time of demo. Compare Cisco Catalyst 9300 and Extreme Networks 5720 Series during demo to decide which one is best for your business.

Still got Questions on your mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Add Product to Compare

close

Recommended Products

20,000+ Software Listed 20,000+ Software Listed

Best Price Guaranteed Best Price Guaranteed

Free Expert
                        Consultation Free Expert Consultation

2M+ Happy Customers 2M+ Happy Customers