linkedin
  • Become a Seller

Bitbucket VS Github

Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of Bitbucket vs Github to find out which one is better. This software comparison between Bitbucket and Github is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether Bitbucket or Github fits your business.

Quick View

  • Rating & Review
  • Platforms
  • Recommended
  • img 4 Ratings & 0 Reviews
  • icon_ubuntu icon_desktop icon_mac
  • img 3 Ratings & 0 Reviews
  • icon_desktop icon_ios icon_Android icon_mac

Pricing

img

Price Plans

$ 3

Standard

$ 6

Premium

View Details img

  • Techjockey Verified
  • Free Trial
  • Lifetime Plan
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img
  • img
  • img

Offers

img

Available offers & discounts

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img

Get Exclusive Offer

Best deals by our expert on your business requirements

Ratings

img

Overall ratings

4.4

4 Ratings & 0 Reviews

95% Likelihood to Recommend

4.7

3 Ratings & 0 Reviews

86% Likelihood to Recommend

Best Use for

img

Business Size:

  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees
  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees

Business Type:

  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers
  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers

Industries:

  • imgAll Industries
  • imgAll Industries

Bitbucket vs Github: Comparision Video

img
img

Features

img

Product features

  • checked Continously Delivery
  • checked Compliance
  • checked Collaboration
  • checked Integration
  • checked CI/CD
  • checked Cloud Security
  • checked DevSecOps
  • checked Collaboration Coding
  • checked Automation &CI/CD
  • checked Security
  • checked Client App
  • checked Project Management
  • checked Team Administration

Specifications

img

Deployment

  • img Web based
  • img On Premises
  • img Web based
  • img On Premises

Device Supported

  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet
  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet

Supported Platforms

  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu
  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu

Languages support

  • imgEnglish
  • imgEnglish

Question and Answers

img

Product related question and answers

Still got Question in Mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Ask Question

How to move files to folder in GitHub? img

To move files to folder in GitHub, use the ‘-git mv’ command. Git then asks ... Read more

How much does GitHub copilot cost? img

GitHub Copilot has multiple plans like individual, team, and enterprise which st... Read more

What is GitHub copilot pricing enterprise? img

GitHub Copilot pricing for enterprise starts at $21/month per active user.

Alternatives

img

Top Alternative Products

Bamboo

Bamboo


Vercel

Vercel


AirOps

AirOps


AI2sql

AI2sql


See all Bitbucket alternatives img
AirOps

AirOps


Vercel

Vercel


AI2sql

AI2sql


Jeli

Jeli


See all Github alternatives img

Send this comparison to my inbox

img Get directly in your email inbox on your Whatsapp

  • India (भारत)+91
  • United States+1
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

Similar Comparison

Bitbucket vs Github Comparison FAQs

Software questions,
answered

GitHub and Bitbucket are popular DevOps tools, each with their pros and cons. On one hand, GitHub is well known for its issue-tracking system that enables teams to create, assign, and prioritize tasks and fix bugs. On the other hand, Bitbucket is favored for its built-in Confluence integration, which allows the teams to collaborate easily.

No, GitHub and Bitbucket are not the same. Both platforms differ greatly in terms of key features and functionalities. Bitbucket facilitates visualization of analysis with charts. In contrast, GitHub enables users to navigate usability across the platform. Therefore, consider your preferences and use cases before making a choice between the 2.

Choosing between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences. GitHub is praised for its large community, extensive integration options, and relevance as the go-to platform for open-source projects. On the other hand, Bitbucket, owned by Atlassian, can seamlessly integrate with various Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence with a clean and easy-to-use UI. However, the final choice will depend on various factors like your team size, existing toolset, project requirements, and more.

No, GitHub and Bitbucket are DevOps tools but have different features and functionalities. In contrast, Bitbucket offers support for both Mercurial and Git VCS (Version Control System). GitHub, on the other hand, only provides support for Git VCS.

No, GitHub cannot replace Bitbucket because both platforms are robust and differ greatly in terms of key features. For instance, Bitbucket helps facilitate the visualization of analysis with charts. However, GitHub does not offer this functionality. Similarly, Bitbucket does not offer support for code-navigation features. On the contrary, with GitHub, you can easily use the code-navigation feature.

GitHub is known for its vibrant open-source community and emphasis on public repositories. It also offers unlimited access to free public repositories. On the other hand, Bitbucket is focused more on private repositories used by large-scale businesses and enterprises.

GitHub and Bitbucket are popular DevOps tools, each with their pros and cons. On one hand, GitHub is well known for its issue-tracking system that enables teams to create, assign, and prioritize tasks and fix bugs. On the other hand, Bitbucket is favored for its built-in Confluence integration, which allows the teams to collaborate easily.

No, GitHub and Bitbucket are not the same. Both platforms differ greatly in terms of key features and functionalities. Bitbucket facilitates visualization of analysis with charts. In contrast, GitHub enables users to navigate usability across the platform. Therefore, consider your preferences and use cases before making a choice between the 2.

Choosing between the two platforms will depend on your specific needs and preferences. GitHub is praised for its large community, extensive integration options, and relevance as the go-to platform for open-source projects. On the other hand, Bitbucket, owned by Atlassian, can seamlessly integrate with various Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence with a clean and easy-to-use UI. However, the final choice will depend on various factors like your team size, existing toolset, project requirements, and more.

No, GitHub and Bitbucket are DevOps tools but have different features and functionalities. In contrast, Bitbucket offers support for both Mercurial and Git VCS (Version Control System). GitHub, on the other hand, only provides support for Git VCS.

No, GitHub cannot replace Bitbucket because both platforms are robust and differ greatly in terms of key features. For instance, Bitbucket helps facilitate the visualization of analysis with charts. However, GitHub does not offer this functionality. Similarly, Bitbucket does not offer support for code-navigation features. On the contrary, with GitHub, you can easily use the code-navigation feature.

GitHub is known for its vibrant open-source community and emphasis on public repositories. It also offers unlimited access to free public repositories. On the other hand, Bitbucket is focused more on private repositories used by large-scale businesses and enterprises.

A Quick Comparison Between Bitbucket vs Github

Choosing any software for your organisation is a crucial decision. As a decision maker, you must ensure that the software you choose addresses the pain points of your teams and reaps maximum benefit for you.

  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Overview
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Pros & Cons
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: In Terms of Features
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Semantic Searching
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Documentation
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Community and Ecosystem
  • GitHub vs. Bitbucket: User Interface
  • Which is Better, GitHub or Bitbucket?

When it comes to developing and deploying machine learning models, having a reliable solution is important. GitHub and Bitbucket are two leading players that serve this purpose, each offering unique features tailored according to the needs of developers and researchers in the field of deep learning.

However, GitHub and Bitbucket differ in terms of their key features and functionalities despite their shared goal. We have differentiated both solutions based on their pros and cons, project size, developer adoption, and more.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Overview

Bitbucket is a robust and versatile platform that is known for hosting, managing, and collaborating on Git repositories. Developed by Atlassian, Bitbucket provides both cloud-based and self-hosted options, thereby catering to the needs of individuals, small teams, and large enterprises.

One of Bitbucket's noteworthy features is its seamless integration with various Atlassian products, including Jira and Confluence, which allows for smooth project management and documentation workflows.

On the other hand, GitHub is known for its comprehensive project management tools, which enable you to organize tasks, track progress, and prioritize work within your repositories. These tools will keep your projects on track and ensure that everyone stays aligned.

Between GitHub and Bitbucket, GitHub is a preferred choice for users who are looking for easy collaboration and open-source projects. On the other hand, when it comes to secure and private development for enterprises, Bitbucket takes the lead.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Pros & Cons

  • Bitbucket has an organized and clean user interface. On the contrary, the UI of GitHub is cluttered and confusing.
  • Bitbucket facilitates the visualization of analysis with charts. However, this feature is not present in GitHub.
  • GitHub enables users to navigate usability, whereas Bitbucket has no navigation feature.
  • While Bitbucket can integrate with some third-party tools, its ecosystem is not as extensive as that of GitHub.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: In Terms of Features

  • Private Repository: Based on the private repository feature, Bitbucket and Bitbucket alternatives will allow you to have a free repository, but it is restricted to only five collaborators. Beyond that, you're supposed to pay an additional fee if you have more than five collaborators. On the other hand, with GitHub, you can create a free private repository, but it is restricted to 3 collaborators.
  • Navigation: Bitbucket does not offer support for code-navigation features. On the contrary, with GitHub, you can easily use the code-navigation feature.
  • Supported VCS: Bitbucket supports both mercurial and Git VCS (Version Control System). However, GitHub only provides support for Git VCS.
  • Project Analysis: Bitbucket facilitates the visualization of analysis with charts. However, GitHub and a few of its alternatives do not offer this functionality.
  • Wikis: Bitbucket allows you to create your wikis for every repository. However, GitHub does not support this feature.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Semantic Searching

Bitbucket has a semantic search feature, an essential search technique that helps users understand the intent and context behind every user query rather than just matching keywords. However, GitHub does not have a semantic search feature.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Documentation

Bitbucket provides users with a built-in Confluence integration that enables teams to collaborate easily on documentation and knowledge sharing. However, GitHub and GitHub alternatives lack built-in documentation integration functionality.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: Community and Ecosystem

While Bitbucket has a community, it's generally smaller in comparison to GitHub. The platform is only preferred by business and enterprise teams. On the contrary, GitHub boasts a large and active developer community, thereby making it a prime platform for open-source projects.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket: User Interface

Bitbucket's UI is well known for its simplicity and user-friendliness as it focuses on essential code management with features like source code, commits, and more. On the other hand, GitHub's UI is more complex and optimized for social coding. Therefore, Bitbucket takes the lead here.

Which is Better, GitHub or Bitbucket?

Bitbucket outshines GitHub in various important areas, making it a favourable choice for the majority of users. First and foremost, Bitbucket has a clean and easy-to-understand user interface, unlike GitHub, so it becomes easy for the users to understand the basic workings of Bitbucket. In addition, Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian, which means that the platform can easily integrate with various Atlassian products, including Jira and Confluence. This makes it a perfect choice for organisations that are already using Atlassian tools.

However, GitHub shines under the free public repositories' parameter. It offers unlimited public repositories for free, with full collaborator access, compared to Bitbucket, which limits free collaborators to 5 on private repositories.

Still got Questions on your mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Add Product to Compare

close

Recommended Products

20,000+ Software Listed 20,000+ Software Listed

Best Price Guaranteed Best Price Guaranteed

Free Expert
                        Consultation Free Expert Consultation

2M+ Happy Customers 2M+ Happy Customers