linkedin
  • Become a Seller

Aruba 5400R VS Aruba CX 6200

Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200 to find out which one is better. This software comparison between Aruba 5400R and Aruba CX 6200 is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200 fits your business.

Quick View

  • Rating & Review
  • Platforms
  • Recommended
  • img 5 Ratings & 0 Reviews
  • Not Available

  • img 4 Ratings & 1 Reviews
  • icon_ubuntu icon_desktop icon_mac

Pricing

img

Price Plans

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

  • Techjockey Verified
  • Free Trial
  • Lifetime Plan
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img
  • img
  • img Free Trial
  • img

Offers

img

Available offers & discounts

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img

Get Exclusive Offer

Best deals by our expert on your business requirements

Ratings

img

Overall ratings

4.3

5 Ratings & 0 Reviews

96% Likelihood to Recommend

4.1

4 Ratings & 1 Reviews

90% Likelihood to Recommend

Pros & Cons

img

Pros

Not Available

Currently no pros are available. Please check back later

img

Stable and secure, ideal for large enterprises, great automation features. - Sikhar.R Mar 24, 2025

Cons

Not Available

Currently no cons are available. Please check back later

img

Not beginner-friendly; CLI commands take time to learn. - Sikhar.R Mar 24, 2025

Reviews

img

Verified customer reviews

Rating

Sagar Ladani Jan 01, 2025

Rating

KOKO's Dec 12, 2024

Stable Performance but Learning Curve for New Users

Sikhar.R Mar 24, 2025

Rating

Mahender Jangra Jan 09, 2025

Best Use for

img

Business Size:

  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees
  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees

Business Type:

  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers
  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers

Industries:

  • imgAll Industries
  • imgAll Industries

We provide the best software solution for your business needs

img
img

Features

img

Product features

  • checked Resiliency
  • checked High Performance
  • checked Cloud Based
  • checked Ready for IoT
  • checked Dynamic Segmentation
  • checked Secure and Simple Access
  • checked Scalable
  • checked High Performance
  • checked Easy Flexible Management
  • checked Dynamic Segmentation
  • checked Network Security Management
  • checked Mobility and IoT Performance
  • checked Quality of Service

Specifications

img

Deployment

  • img Web based
  • img On Premises
  • img Web based
  • img On Premises

Device Supported

  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet
  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet

Supported Platforms

  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu
  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu

Languages support

  • imgEnglish
  • imgEnglish

Alternatives

img

Top Alternative Products

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1930

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1930


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830 24G

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830 24G


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1430

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1430


See all Aruba 5400R alternatives img
HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1930

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1930


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830 24G

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830 24G


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1830


HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1430

HPE Networking Instant On Switch Series 1430


See all Aruba CX 6200 alternatives img

Send this comparison to my inbox

img Get directly in your email inbox on your Whatsapp

  • India (भारत)+91
  • United States+1
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Macedonia (FYROM) (Македонија)+389
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358

Similar Comparison

Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200 Comparison FAQs

Software questions,
answered

While Aruba 5400R offers customized features, Aruba CX 6200 has diverse modules. Select between Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200 as per your business needs.

Both these products offer similar features but with a different approach. While Aruba 5400R emphasizes on user experiences, Aruba CX 6200 focuses on functionalities.

It all depends on the functionalities that you prefer. While Aruba 5400R offers add-ons along with essential features, Aruba CX 6200 emphasizes on customization.

No, the difference between Aruba 5400R and Aruba CX 6200 lies in terms of features and functionalities. While Aruba 5400R can be customized as per the user’s needs, Aruba CX 6200 addresses the diverse audience.

It depends upon your business requirement. Both Aruba 5400R and Aruba CX 6200 provides standard features to cater diverse industry needs.

The difference lies in terms of the user interface and functionalities. While Aruba 5400R is customizable, Aruba 5400R offers comprehensive modules.

A Quick Comparison Between Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200

Choosing any software for your organisation is a crucial decision. As a decision maker, you must ensure that the software you choose addresses the pain points of your teams and reaps maximum benefit for you.

  • Comparison of Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200 In terms of Features
  • Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry
  • Which Is Better? - Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200

Comparison of Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200 In terms of Features

Aruba 5400R includes features like Cyber Resiliency Support, High Performance, Cloud Based and Built for IoT. Aruba CX 6200 is known for functionalities like Scalable, High Performance, Easy Flexible Management and Dynamics effect. When you compare Aruba 5400R vs Aruba CX 6200, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. The one which suits your business needs is the best.

Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry

Aruba 5400R is ideal for industries like All Industries. For All Industries, Aruba CX 6200 is a better choice. If you are confused between Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200, you can also check if the software has customizable modules for your industry. Industry-specific functionalities will ensure higher efficiency and ROI. However, do check for the hidden price, is any.

Which Is Better? - Aruba 5400R or Aruba CX 6200

Aruba 5400R and Aruba CX 6200 can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs. If you are looking for a platform that is easy to use, has low barriers to entry, and offers a lot of customization, flexibility, and integration options, then you must compare their specifications in detail at the time of demo. Compare Aruba 5400R and Aruba CX 6200 during demo to decide which one is best for your business.

Still got Questions on your mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Add Product to Compare

close

Recommended Products

20,000+ Software Listed 20,000+ Software Listed

Best Price Guaranteed Best Price Guaranteed

Free Expert
                        Consultation Free Expert Consultation

2M+ Happy Customers 2M+ Happy Customers