linkedin
  • Become a Seller

Aerospike VS Mongodb

Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of Aerospike vs Mongodb to find out which one is better. This software comparison between Aerospike and Mongodb is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether Aerospike or Mongodb fits your business.

Quick View

  • Rating & Review
  • Platforms
  • Recommended
  • Not Available

  • icon_ubuntu icon_desktop icon_mac icon_linux
  • Not Available

  • img 5 Ratings & 0 Reviews
  • icon_desktop

Pricing

img

Price Plans

Price on Request

Get customise plan according to your business requirement

Get Price

$ 57

Dedicated

View Details img

  • Techjockey Verified
  • Free Trial
  • Lifetime Plan
  • img
  • img
  • img
  • img

Offers

img

Available offers & discounts

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Buy Now & Pay Later, Check offer on payment page.

img Save upto 28%, Get GST Invoice on your business purchase

img Buy Now & Pay Later, Check offer on payment page.

img

Get Exclusive Offer

Best deals by our expert on your business requirements

Ratings

img

Overall ratings

Not Available

Currently no ratings are available. Please check back later

4.5

5 Ratings & 0 Reviews

86% Likelihood to Recommend

Best Use for

img

Business Size:

  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees
  • img Individual
  • img 2-50 Employees
  • img 51-250 Employees
  • img 250-500 Employees
  • img 500​-​1000 Employees
  • img More than 1000+ Employees

Business Type:

  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers
  • img Small Business
  • img Startups
  • img Medium Business
  • img Enterprise
  • img SMBs
  • img SMEs
  • img MSMBs
  • img MSMEs
  • img Freelancers

Industries:

  • imgAll Industries
  • imgAll Industries

We provide the best software solution for your business needs

img
img

Features

img

Product features

  • checked NoSQL Databases
  • checked Performance Management
  • checked Security Management
  • checked Database Management
  • checked Integrations
  • checked Deployment Flexibility
  • checked Dashboards
  • checked Data Migration
  • checked Security
  • checked API Integration
  • checked Monitoring & Alert
  • checked Performance optimization
  • checked Document Database
  • checked Workload Scalability

Specifications

img

Deployment

  • img Web based
  • img On Premises
  • img Web based
  • img On Premises

Device Supported

  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet
  • img Desktop
  • img Mobile
  • img iPad
  • img Tablet

Supported Platforms

  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu
  • img Windows
  • img Mac OS
  • img Android
  • img iOS
  • img Linux
  • img Ubuntu

Languages support

  • imgEnglish
  • imgEnglish

Alternatives

img

Top Alternative Products

BangDB

BangDB


Redis

Redis


Cassandra

Cassandra


ScyllaDB

ScyllaDB


See all Aerospike alternatives img
Cassandra

Cassandra


BangDB

BangDB


Redis

Redis


ScyllaDB

ScyllaDB


See all Mongodb alternatives img

Send this comparison to my inbox

img Get directly in your email inbox on your Whatsapp

Similar Comparison

Aerospike vs Mongodb Comparison FAQs

Software questions,
answered

Aerospike can be a better option than MongoDB if you are looking for a platform with high performance, low latency, and strong consistency. It is well-suited for large datasets, real-time workloads, and geographically distributed deployments.

No, Aerospike and MongoDB differ in their underlying architecture and data models. Aerospike uses a wide-column store model, while MongoDB employs a document-oriented model. Additionally, Aerospike focuses on high throughput and low latency, while MongoDB emphasizes flexibility and ease of use.

Aerospike may be better for high-throughput transactional applications, real-time bidding platforms. On the other hand, MongoDB might be better suited for scenarios where flexibility and ease of development are priorities, such as content management systems or e-commerce platforms.

No, Aerospike and MongoDB are different when it comes to visualization. For instance, MongoDB offers MongoDB compass for better data visualization and Aerospike has Aerospike Management Console (AMC), for data insights.

MongoDB can replace Aerospike if users require flexible data structures, better indexing and querying capabilities and if they are dealing with small and medium workloads.

Aerospike and MongoDB differ in their data models, query languages, architectures, and performance characteristics. Aerospike stores data in key-value pairs with optional record types, and emphasizes high throughput and low latency, while MongoDB uses a document-oriented model and offers flexibility and ease of development.

A Quick Comparison Between Aerospike vs Mongodb

Choosing any software for your organisation is a crucial decision. As a decision maker, you must ensure that the software you choose addresses the pain points of your teams and reaps maximum benefit for you.

  • MongoDB and Aerospike: Overview
  • MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Pros and Cons
  • MongoDB vs. Aerospike: In Terms of Features
  • Aerospike vs. MongoDB: Performance
  • MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Integration
  • MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Visualization
  • MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Customer Support
  • Which is Better, MongoDB or Aerospike?

When we talk about data management solutions (DBMS), MongoDB and Aerospike are two leading platforms that come to our mind. Each offers unique features and capabilities tailored to diverse business needs. But which one is an ideal option for you? While both platforms aim to provide efficient and scalable data storage solutions, they differ significantly in terms of architecture, performance, and use cases.

So, let's have a detailed comparison of Aerospike versus MongoDB in terms of different aspects. By the end of this comparison, you can easily tell which platform will be best for your specific database management requirements.

MongoDB and Aerospike: Overview

Before we compare Aerospike vs MongoDB, let’s understand a bit about both these NoSQL databases.

MongoDB was founded in 2007, and it is a versatile document-oriented database which is designed for scalability, flexibility, and ease of development. It features a document-oriented data model, allowing developers to store and retrieve data in JSON-like documents. It is well-suited for applications that need complex data models, dynamic schemas, and scalability across distributed systems.

In contrast, Aerospike, previously known as CitrusLeaf, offers a high-performance key-value store architecture which is well optimized for speed and efficiency. Its in-memory database capabilities coupled with solid state drive (SSD) storage enable lightning-fast data access and processing. This makes it ideal for real-time applications that need high throughput and low latency.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Pros and Cons

  • MongoDB doesn't have a built-in solution for handling writes across geographically distributed clusters. On the other hand, Aerospike offers cross-datacenter replication (XDR) for geographically distributed deployments, making it suitable for edge computing.
  • Aerospike can scale horizontally with ease. It does not require any complex sharding configuration unlike MongoDB.
  • MongoDB supports over 25 programming languages including C++, C#, C, Dart, ERlang, and more. On the surface, Aerospike offers fewer languages compared to MongoDB and supports around 15 languages such as C, Java, Go, PHP, Python, Ruby etc.
  • Aerospike only works with Linux OS natively. You need to use Docker to run it on other operating systems. Nevertheless, MongoDB is available for Windows, macOS, Solaris and even Linux.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike: In Terms of Features

Both MongoDB and Aerospike differ from each other when it comes to query language, data model, sharding durability and more. Here is a comparison between MongoDB and Aerospike in terms of features:

  • Query Language: MongoDB uses a variant of JavaScript called MQL (MongoDB Query Language) for querying data. MQL offers a familiar syntax for developers familiar with JavaScript and allows for complex queries, including aggregations and geospatial queries. Whereas Aerospike uses its own proprietary query language called AQL (Aerospike Query Language). AQL is specifically designed for Aerospike's key-value model and offers basic filtering and retrieval capabilities. This gives MongoDB an upper hand over Aerospike in terms of querying language.
  • Data Model: MongoDB uses a flexible data model and stores data in JSON-like documents with flexible schema. This means that each document can have a different structure, which allows for easy evolution of data structures over time. However, there might be some complexity to query the data due to schema flexibility. Aerospike on the other hand, stores data in key-value pairs with optional record types which offer faster data retrieval due to simpler structure. This requires faster lookups but requires more upfront schema design.
  • Indexing: MongoDB and a few other MongoDB alternatives offer a variety of indexing options including single-field, compound, multi-key, and text indexes. This flexibility allows for efficient querying of various data structures. Aerospike primarily uses secondary indexes for faster retrieval based on specific fields. Indexes need to be pre-defined for efficient querying, which requires upfront planning. So, when it comes to indexing, MongoDB offers better flexibility and write performance compared to Aerospike.
  • Sharding: MongoDB supports manual sharding and it requires manual configuration which involves splitting the database across multiple servers (shards) based on a shard key. This can be complex to manage and requires careful planning for optimal performance. On the surface, Aerospike and some other Aerospike alternatives offer automatic sharding where data is automatically distributed across nodes using a hashing function on the record key. This simplifies cluster management and eliminates the need for manual sharding configuration.
  • Durability: With MongoDB, data is written to the primary node's memory by default, and then the data is asynchronously replicated to secondary nodes. This means there's a small chance of data loss if the primary node fails before replication. You can configure synchronous replication for stronger durability, but this can further impact write performance. Whereas Aerospike ensures better data durability by writing data to both memory and disk (SSD) before replicating it to secondary nodes. This provides strong durability and a minimal risk of data loss even in case of hardware failures.
  • Scaling Approach: MongoDB scales horizontally by adding more nodes to a cluster. This process involves sharding, which partitions data across nodes based on a shard key. This approach is powerful, but sharding can be complex to configure and manage, especially at large scale. For that matter, Aerospike scales horizontally with automatic data distribution across nodes. It uses a hashing function to distribute data, eliminating the need for manual sharding. This approach simplifies cluster management and can be easier to scale as compared to MongoDB.

Aerospike vs. MongoDB: Performance

Aerospike is designed for high performance and low latency. It prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for real-time applications with high throughput and demanding read/write workloads.

On the contrary, MongoDB offers good performance for most use cases, especially with proper indexing. However, writing performance can be slower for large datasets or complex queries.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Integration

MongoDB offers a wider range of native integrations with various programming languages, frameworks, and cloud platforms. There are also several third-party libraries and tools available for further integration possibilities. Aerospike provides client libraries in various languages like Java, Python, Node.js, etc., allowing developers to interact with the database. However, the overall integration ecosystem might be smaller compared to MongoDB, especially for specific frameworks and cloud platforms.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Visualization

MongoDB has an advantage over Aerospike as it provides a user-friendly web-based interface (MongoDB Compass) for database management and visualization. It offers intuitive tools for querying and monitoring. On the other hand, Aerospike offers a comprehensive web-based management console, Aerospike Management Console (AMC), which provides real-time insights but is not as robust as MongoDB’s Compass.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike: Customer Support

MongoDB provides comprehensive customer support through documentation, community forums, and professional services, offering expert assistance for troubleshooting and optimization. Aerospike offers dedicated support channels, including phone and email support, along with extensive documentation and training resources.

Which is Better, MongoDB or Aerospike?

Both MongoDB and Aerospike offer robust data management solutions with unique strengths and capabilities.

MongoDB excels in flexibility, scalability, and query flexibility, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases, including content management systems, e-commerce platforms, and real-time analytics applications.

Aerospike stands out for its exceptional performance, low-latency access, and high availability, making it ideal for high-throughput transactional applications, real-time bidding platforms, and gaming applications demanding real-time responsiveness.

Ultimately, the choice between MongoDB and Aerospike depends on specific application requirements, performance objectives, and scalability needs.

Author: Amit Singh

Still got Questions on your mind?

Get answered by real users or software experts

Add Product to Compare

close

Recommended Products

20,000+ Software Listed 20,000+ Software Listed

Best Price Guaranteed Best Price Guaranteed

Free Expert
                        Consultation Free Expert Consultation

2M+ Happy Customers 2M+ Happy Customers